Postcolonialism
By definition, postcolonialism is a period of time after
colonialism, and postcolonial literature is typically characterized by its
opposition to the colonial. However, some critics have argued that any
literature that expresses an opposition to colonialism, even if it is produced
during a colonial period, may be defined as postcolonial, primarily due to its
oppositional nature. Postcolonial literature often focuses on race relations
and the effects of racism and usually indicts white and/or colonial societies.
Despite a basic consensus on the general themes of postcolonial writing,
however, there is ongoing debate regarding the meaning of postcolonialism. Many
critics now propose that the term should be expanded to include the literatures
of Canada, the United States, and Australia. In his essay discussing the nature
and boundaries of postcolonialism, Simon During argues for a more inclusive
definition, calling it “the need, in nations, or groups which have been victims
of imperialism to achieve an identity uncontaminated by universalist or
Eurocentric concepts or images.” The scale and scope of modern European
imperialism, as well as its extraordinarily organized character, including the
cultural licensing of racial domination, has sometimes led to the perception of
colonization as a modern phenomenon. In fact, many critics propose that modern
colonialism was not a discrete occurrence and that an examination of premodern
colonial activities will allow for a greater and more complex understanding of
modern structures of power and domination, serving to illuminate the operation
of older histories in the context of both modern colonialism and contemporary
race and global political relations.
Works of literature that are defined as postcolonial often
record racism or a history of genocide, including slavery, apartheid, and the
mass extinction of peoples, such as the Aborigines in Australia. Critical
response to these texts is often seen as an important way to articulate and
negotiate communication between writers who define themselves as postcolonial
and critics who are not part of that experience. In her introduction to
Post-Colonial and African American Women's Writing, published in 2000, Gina
Wisker notes that the indictment present in many postcolonial texts tends to
produce guilt or feelings of inherited complicity in many readers. Also,
although writing about these texts may raise the level of awareness of both the
texts and their writers, some postcolonial writers see reflected in this
activity an arrogant assumption about the need for noncolonial cultures to
recognize postcolonial writers. Similarly, other critics have noted that
critical response that focuses entirely on the essential nature of black or
Asian writers may also serve to marginalize their writing by supposing their
experiences as largely a product of being “other” than European.
Postcolonialism includes a vast array of writers and
subjects. In fact, the very different geographical, historical, social,
religious, and economic concerns of the different ex-colonies dictate a wide
variety in the nature and subject of most postcolonial writing. Wisker has
noted in her book that it is even simplistic to theorize that all postcolonial
writing is resistance writing. In fact, many postcolonial writers themselves
will argue that their countries are still very much colonial countries, both in
terms of their values and behaviors, and that these issues are reflected in
their work. In her essay on postcolonialism, Deepika Bahri agrees, noting that
while the definition of postcolonialism may be fairly boundaried, the actual
use of the term is very subjective, allowing for a yoking together of a very
diverse range of experiences, cultures, and problems. This diversity of
definitions exists, notes Bahri, because the term postcolonialism is used both
as a literal description of formerly colonial societies and as a description of
global conditions after a period of colonialism. In this regard, according to
Bahri, the notion of the “postcolonial” as a literary genre and an academic
construct may have meanings that are completely separate from a historical
moment or time period.
Some women colonial writers draw a relationship between
postcolonialism and feminism. For many of these writers, who live in strong
patriarchal cultures, language and the ability to write and communicate
represent power. Some of these writers, for example, have noted that since the
language of British-ruled colonies is English, literature written in English
has often been used to marginalize and constrain female points of view. In the
postcolonial period, however, language, and the ability to speak, write, and
publish, has become an enabling tool for postcolonial authors
No comments:
Post a Comment